Friday, May 25, 2012

Click or quit?

We post statuses, tweet some gossips, email stuffs or comment in extremes. Lots of the same thing that we keep ourselves busy about. And at some point, it even affects us real time. Say, if all these net activities will be taken away for one day, we’ll definitely run amok. That somehow made us a bit attached or even dependent to this so-called Social Networks. Our lives are way changed from the usual primitive non-virtual communications wherein people get content with snail mails or even travel hard just to see loved ones. People’s lives are becoming easy, convenient and virtual. And we can call this life we have now as virtually inspired ones.

Let’s think complex.

How about if we complicate things and coincide this Social Network into every aspects of our lives? Say, getting this virtual behavior of ours as a determining aspect of our careers in life. And that before us being hired or so, we should first disclose identities used in our Social networking sites, attached on our CV (Curriculum Vitae) and be judged accordingly. And even more, by making use of our Social Network behavior as the basis for our continuing fitness in our choice of employment. Let us crack that idea and put it in context. What will be our say when all these scenarios are brought into our land?

We have to delineate.

Our works/careers in whatever fields it might be should all come as one aspect of our living life. And our personal lives, in whatever ways and means of dealing the same should also be in another aspect thereof. Simply put, they are of two different animals. Once you commingle the same, you end up misunderstanding things as is.

Our personal lives, which involve how we interact with loved ones, communicate or reach out to them, are not the same as before. Now, we used a lot of means to do those things since places and locations are becoming borderless and that some of us go abroad and seek greener pastures or some of us, separate lives and seek new ones, but really have to connect again whatever means possible. Technology made all these things possible through Social Networks via internet. We have Skype, Yahoo, Gmails, Twitter, Myspace, or even the ever controversial Facebook; and everybody connects. But alongside these trending changes as to our communications and interactions lie some basic miscommunications and misunderstandings, which are, naturally normal, like talking and conversing humans, face-to-face. What just happen now is the leveling up of our ways and means of our interactions to others, close or stranger, friends or unfriended people. We stretch extra miles and adapt internet and its underlying Social Networks which undoubtedly offer big time packages and dozens of happiness to us. But still, it remains to be private in a sense that it belongs to the aspect of our personal lives, just an upgraded ones.

Contrariwise, there lies our career lives. This is another aspect of our life that we really be serious about. Just to take note of the things that our work/career is capable of bringing us like, finances, support and stability. These stuffs deserve to be preserved and worked on as hard as possible with. Our employer is our boss and the Company policy is our law, this is elementary. We work as mandated of us, considering the dos and don’ts of employment per se. We get paid accordingly. And we’ll be bringing extra happiness to our families and friends alike since we have the money that we knuckled down through our work. And what is next is all fun. We celebrate, real hard and capture photos harder. And we let our friends and families know how happy we are and post albums on Facebook. This is the usual trend of today. We let people know what happened to us, either good or bad. Since these Social networks like Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, and lots of the same cloth alongside people’s activities to all its applications and freebies are so commonplace. No age limitations, or career restrictions, children and adults alike do the same thing on a daily basis. They communicate online, chat online, post comments and photos side by side, check whose online, busy, away or idle, things like these are usually done in private. And all these pertain to that so-called virtual behavior.

And what is the catch? You’ll simply get fired when your virtual behavior run afoul to that of the Company’s or Employer’s. Or worse, you will not be admitted for work if your virtual behavior goes poles apart from that of the Company’s.

We have to settle this.

The company has its own rules and regulations, policy and mandates in regulating and maintaining employees, that is a fact. But to what extent are all these mandates apply? This basically applies to whatever work-related matters within the working environment or workplace. Problems, differences and inequities within the scope of the working environment can best be settled likewise within management and employees accordingly. All this rooted from issues that are work-related per se. However, there are instances that employers delve deeper into the matter and resolve conflicts in relation to employees’ virtual behavior. They basically do so for lack of things visible within the four corners of working place to be used against employees in dealing with conflicts and resolving the same. Like in hiring, CVs are normal, but some employers really required your log-in passwords to Social Network sites of your choice and that you are active about and based everything with that. And when you are a bona fide employee already and encountered something heightened conflict without much basis for you to get fired, employers go leaked on your Social network activities and find loopholes provided therein. What companies and employers do is this: when all things fail and you have to do it still, go trawling the internet.

Are they overdoing things? Yes, they are.

As what we have established above, both the career and personal aspects of everybody’s life go different path and hence, not to be taken in the same way. Both are in isolation to each other. You have your own personal life before you have your career life, or in rare case, otherwise. Your career life has its own scope and extent which is not in any way coinciding with your personal life. Mixing it up is a no-no since it is elementary to separate your personal lives to your work, just to make things objective. Employees can do this segregation as much as possible since too much stress in work when added to such stress in personal life, might be that morbid. And how about employers and company you are working with? You don’t have that control. Maybe yes, maybe no. But what is for our concern is the former. They do things as described above. And what will be your recourse? Back off.

This is hitting below the belt already. You are not working just to be peeped at personally. True enough, that you are to be monitored or supervised by bosses or immediate supervisors alike. But this has limitations, which has something to do with work-related matters ONLY. Matters like how you looked like in your DP in Facebook, how you managed to comment back, how you posted statuses, tweeted, or how you write on your blog are just some of the things that remained to be your private matters. These have nothing to do with the way you sailed on your choice of career. And by so considering the same is in no way appropriate to be claimed as management prerogative since the latter refers to rights of an employer to regulate all aspects of employment, such as the freedom to prescribe work assignments, working methods, processes to be followed, regulation regarding transfer of employees, supervision of their work, lay-off and discipline, and dismissal and recall of workers. (Baybay Water District vs. COA 2002).[1] Basically, referring working performance and decisions to social network activities and behavior is highly flawed, much more a violation.

When we look closer into the matter, we initially grasp the existence of power play. The management as the more superior entity should not overpower labor (employees) all because of the latter’s vulnerability. What else can an ordinary employee or even aspirant to be an employee do, but to succumb to such requirement of giving access to social network sites that they are active about and attached therewith to CVs when applying or be basis for continued fitness in the company, all because they want the job or want to eke out a living. This should not be the practice. Ethically, morally and legally, this added requirement of companies and employers alike is a concrete violation therefore.

What has been violated? It is the Right to privacy of employees. Although we might not have a specific law on Privacy matters, we have some provisions that will not let those invaders to privacy scot-free. We have in our New Civil Code, which provides that:

Art. 26. Every person shall respect the dignity, personality, privacy and peace of mind of his neighbors and other persons. The following and similar acts, though they may not constitute a criminal offense, shall produce a cause of action for damages, prevention and other relief:
(1) Prying into the privacy of another's residence:
(2) Meddling with or disturbing the private life or family relations of another;
(3) Intriguing to cause another to be alienated from his friends;
(4) Vexing or humiliating another on account of his religious beliefs, lowly station in life, place of birth, physical defect, or other personal condition.

This is in relation to one of the Rights of every person under our Constitution, particularly, Article 3 (Bill of Rights), Section 3 which says that:

Sec. 3. (1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise as prescribed by law. (2) Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceedings.

The inviolability of privacy as to communication and correspondence which include some of our ways and means of reaching out to others with the use of internet, like emails, blogs and the like, has to be preserved unless there is this lawful order of the court or when public safety or order requires the same. Absent the two exceptions would leave our right to such privacy as firm as possible. This guaranty under our Constitution can also be correlated to our Electronic Commerce Act, particularly Section 31 which provides as follows:

Section 31. Lawful Access. – Access to an electronic file, or an electronic signature of an electronic data message or electronic document shall only be authorized and enforced in favor of the individual or entity having a legal right to the possession or the use of plaintext, electronic signature or file or solely for the authorized purposes. The electronic key for identity or integrity shall not be made available to any person or party without the consent of the individual or entity in lawful possession of that electronic key

Hence, these electronic documents or messages in matters which are presumed to be private should neither be accessed nor possessed to any other means aside from the ones authorized by the lawful possessor of the same. Employees in possession of those electronic documents or messages like emails or the like have the sole authority to take hold of the same and can only consent of its access wholeheartedly and not vitiated by any unreasonable power play by employers. 

Hence further, in order for us to put everything squarely, let’s do the basic principle of all time, Respect each other’s rights. The employees should respect the policy and mandates that the Management reasonably imposed and likewise the Management must also see to it that it will respect the rights of employees alike. When any of them goes overboard, the corresponding law regarding such should be applied accordingly. 

To sum it up, we should always be reminded that we are in a democratic country and for us to live up to that spirit (that is, if we still have it), let everybody, without discrimination and preference; be accorded with the right to express themselves and so as the right to be protected in doing the same appropriately. The latter right guaranteed to every person amounts to their right to privacy which is considered as the Mother of all Rights which ought to be respected. Whatever things considered private, should remain to be private, and whatever it is that is considered public, should likewise be public in the eyes of every persons alike. Think this way and we would not have that problem in the future.


















[1] http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/cberd/pdf/papers/Working%20Paper%202004-04.PDF

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is your stand the same with regard to public corporations and government offices on the said hiring requirement? Persons in government will of course be holding positions that are both critical and confidential as they carry the government’s interests and image, and to a certain extent the general public as well. Don’t you think that they should be thoroughly and comprehensively evaluated since public service and national security is involved

    - Dindo Cervantes (2010-0130)

    P.S.

    Peace Cathy!!! Hehe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wish to reply on this.

    My stand is still the same. Employees alike, may it be confidential or not have to be accorded their right to privacy. I'll try to dissect what you're asking me of, you said that since some employees in the government hold confidential positions, they should be thoroughly evaluated on their character so as not to prejudice pubic service much more the security of the country.

    What do you mean by thorough evaluation then? Do we have in our existing laws certain concrete definition regarding this kind of evaluation that will distinguish employees from being confidential or not? I wish to be enlightened on this, if any. And does this kind of evaluation have this need to rummage about personal information of employees THROUGH SOCIAL NETWORKS, to that extent? I know for certain that public corporation/government of ours have been in quite a long time existing as an establish institution in our land. Hence, we already have this kind of classifications of employees since time immemorial, be it confidential or not. And it stood the test of time DESPITE THE ABSENCE OF INTERNET before. Government hired confidential positions way back time and up to now. And did they require those people before hiring, to give access to whatever social networking sites you might be in? Not any, as far as I know. Do you mean to say that all because they are hailed as officers holding confidential positions would now depart them from the rest of employees in the government and thereby allowing them to be invaded privacy in that sense? This is quite lame.

    Our Civil Code never distinguishes persons as to occupation for them to be accorded their right to privacy. It says and I wish quote it, “Art. 26. Every person shall respect the dignity, personality, privacy and peace of mind of his neighbors and other persons…”

    What I have in mind when it comes to this as far as our laws are concerned would lead me to consider, RA 6713 which pertains to Rules Implementing the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, this law provides for some requirements for a public official (not to distinguish confidential positions from the rest) to follow certain mandates that:

    Section 3. Every department, office or agency shall provide official information, records or documents to any requesting public, except if:
    xxxx
    (e) it would disclose information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

    Hence, one of the exceptions for divulging into public certain information of officials alike includes an instance wherein it constitute unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. This, in line with the other provision under the same Act provides further that:

    Rule VII
    Public Disclosure
    Section 1. Every official and employee, except those who serve in an official honorary capacity, without service credit or pay, temporary laborers and casual or temporary and contractual workers, shall file under oath their statements of assets, liabilities and networth and a disclosure of business interest and financial connections including those of their spouses and unmarried children under eighteen (18) years of age living in their households..

    To count on this, I believe that employees whatever position you might have still fall under the same Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards. And that it is still elementary to rely on the rule that when the law does not distinguish, we should not distinguish. When those provisions of law mentioned above do not distinguish officials and employees alike, we should not likewise distinguish. Employees or officials of the government alike are required those same mentioned public disclosures. Does social networking information whatsoever included therewith?

    ReplyDelete
  4. 2 points to consider:

    First, the internet was non-existent back then. The social media explosion only came during the oo's (after Y2K) and it was only then that social networking was considered a global phenomenon. Arguably, Facebook and twitter, did infinitely better than its predecessors like friendster; they are more recent as well. 2nd, the times right now are very different from before as we can feel the effect of information explosion more at present as compared to older times.

    In my blog, I referred to the state's police power:

    "state authority to enact legislation that may interfere with personal liberty or property in order to promote general welfare" (Sangalang vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, GR No. 71169).

    From what you have said, it seems that you are referring to public officials and not potential employees.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I appreciate the points you’ve considered.

    I’ll just have to make some add-on to my previous comment.

    On your first concern about time difference and information explosion of today via social networks, indeed I feel that same effect, personally. But will this “information explosion” thing be enough for us to deviate as far as invading one’s privacy? We know for certain that we are in an age way beyond the old times. We are changing even fast pace. But still we have our laws guaranteeing our rights. It comes side by side. And it stands solid despite these differences. Having said that, I don’t think we have to compromise at certain point when there is still option for us to choose from. Leave things as it is: our right to privacy to be respected in one aspect, and technology to flourish in another aspect.

    On your second concern about me referring only to public officials and not to potential employees with respect to my previous comment, indeed I answered on that tone, most probably. But that was just a possible way to answer your question about hiring persons holding confidential positions so and so. Or maybe just a mere method of stating points. Besides, public officials and potential employees alike, still have to be governed with similar laws and rights. It’s of no moment for us to distinguish one from the other with respect to their Right to Privacy.

    And at any rate, I really truly appreciate you sharing some insights regarding the issue. Thank you. :)

    ReplyDelete